In today’s society there is the moral debate over
rather books will eventually become superfluous due to innovations such as the
internet and more specifically creations like eBooks. In the two blog posts, “Why is it better to
read eBooks? Environmental friendly books” by Henry Conrad and “Why I Read [actual]
Books” by Dave Rohde, two opposite sides of the argument are represented in
unique manners.
In
the first blog, “Why is it better to read eBooks? Environmental friendly books”
by Henry Conrad, introduces the topic of eBooks by first informing the reader
of the importance of reading in today’s society and how reading will continue
to impact daily life. He then
transitions into what an eBook is and the benefits to eBooks as opposed to
books. There are three bullet points are short concise reasons eBooks are better followed by a paragraph long explanation. Conrad’s writing is informative and to the
point but only explores the benefits and does not mention any disadvantages. One advantage is of course, the
accessibility, “On the other hand,
you can easily search for an eBook or eBooks without having to go somewhere.” In the end there is an
easily found conclusion that clarifies eBooks are the way to go, “EBooks are more eco-friendly...” The writing, as customary to blogs, is very
personal with the repeated use of “you” which speaks directly to the reader and
how eBooks can further impact the individual’s life in a positive manner. In addition to his praise for the eBooks and
their benefits, there is a picture of what can safely presumed to be an eBook
on an iPad. Conrad appeals to the pathos
and the manner eBooks directly impact the individual. His tone is somewhat assertive as if he knows
what is the right choice and the reader should agree. This post was a very strong claim for the
continued, and possibly expanded, use of eBooks because of the importance of
reading and access to the written word in our modern day society.
In
the second blog, and “Why I Read [actual] Books” by Dave Rohde, the tone is
softer and affects the reader’s emotions more gently. Rohde also presents his claim with a
semi-comical and more enjoyable approach.
As stated in the title, he is a fan of books that are tangible. “No one ever walks into an Apple Store, picks
up an iPad and says, ‘I love the way this thing smells.’” He speaks of his personal experience, which
increases his ethos, and mentions how he has grown to appreciate books and
reading. Also in terms of ethos, Rohde
quotes two outside gentlemen. Rohde’s claim supports reading adamantly and
expresses how important the “medium” is, in this case, books. He uses the word “I” often throughout the
piece which increases his appeal to readers because this claim is obviously
important to him and impacts him directly.
According to Rohde “We need to allow books to inspire us and alter our
worldview.” He uses powerful
language and diction that provokes thought and inspires passion for those
readers who are struggling with the technology that is taking over the literary
world. Rohde has written a piece that defends
the continued use of books even as the world changes.
Conrad
and Rohde, although arguing different sides of an interesting question over
rather or not books will become obsolete, both men have used blogging as the
means for communication his opinion. However,
Conrad and Rohde have different manners of presenting their claims and
informing the reader of the benefits of eBooks/books, through the use of
diction, ethos, pathos, and more.
Moreover, both ways of presentation were effective, informative, and persuasive.
No comments:
Post a Comment